Why AI Governance Needs to Embrace Both Quantitative and Qualitative Benefits
( In press on The World Financial Review)
The great change has taken place allowing AI work effectively at enterprises in terms of productivity and ameliorating clients’ satisfaction. Nevertheless, the frameworks governing AI must involve more than shunning off prospects of danger; instead, they also need to encompass some quantifiable (tangible) and intangible (felt) advantages. This two-faceted manner allows for optimal benefits from AI as well as protection from its possible problems.
The Expanding Role of AI Governance
In the conventional sense, AI governance tends to emphasize on the management of risks such as data privacy ethics and regulatory compliance. With increased implementation of AI, governance should also encompass broader values such as balancing operational objectives against other organizational considerations. To the World Economic Forum a successful AI policy would entail taking into account all dimensions of AI’s benefits and risks through a combination of securing it and enabling value creation.–( World Economic Forum)
Key Quantitative Benefits
Cost Savings and Enhanced Efficiency through Automation: AI saves money by executing repetitive tasks automatically/without manual intervention and thereby allowing workers to focus on being strategic. In McKinsey’s words, the use of AI within supply chain and services can lead to a decrease in expenses(McKinsey & Company)
Revenue Growth: AI adds to gain in revenue by optimising choices and enhancing consumer services. Firms that apply AI properly are said by Boston Consulting Group to attain tangible advantages that are especially manifested in technology and financial sectors. (BCG Global)
Key Qualitative Benefits
Employee empowerment: AI improves job satisfaction level through handling routine activities, thus enabling staff to perform tasks that are more meaningful. According to MIT Sloan Management Review, employees who understand and use AI feel more empowered (MIT Sloan Management Review)
Collaborative culture: By fostering cross-functional cooperation, AI can promote team work as well as enhance transparency within organizations. In flatter organizational structures that promote collaboration, artificial intelligence (AI) based adoption often results according to McKinsey & Company (McKinsey & Company)
Customer satisfaction: Usage of artificial intelligence in customer service helps in making on-time and more precise responses leading to increase in client satisfaction rates Harvard Law Corporate Governance Forum noted that customer experience in service roles as well as workers’ morale were improved with the incorporation of AI into such activities .
Suggestions for Governance Teams.
Here are some suggestions that can be applied when someone wants to form a governance team:
Collaboration Across Functions: Consultants who have different knowledge from each other including finance professionals; IT specialists; compliance officers offer AI’s holistic perspective worldwide.
Stakeholders should be engaged: It can also help in gathering information from employees or customers by consulting people so as to ensure that anything which is done under AI makes sense on the ground and helps address current challenges (SHRM)
Dual metrics : they can be defined as those that should be monitored using KPIs in such way that cost savings, revenues growth can specifically be measured, while OKRs focus on broader goals (Objectives) and define success through measurable outcomes (Key Results). This approach helps to track qualitative aspects like employee engagement, cultural alignment, and customer satisfaction.
Summing Up?
To unlock AI’s full potential responsibly, AI governance requires embracing both quantitative and qualitative benefits. That is accomplished by objectively gaining insights into organizations with external experts thus keeping abreast of industry benchmarks. For both organizations and employees to see value out of it, not only should we have an all-inclusive framework for governance of artificial intelligence but also in such a way that its risks are mitigated of course and even balanced by benefits and progressive achievements.
Be aware that
Companies, especially those in high-regulated markets, are not supporting an extended governance model: They are feared they could slow innovation and difficult (and expensive) to measure qualitative benefits, standing for (only, but it is an euphemism ) compliance and risk reduction
Comentários